I was torn about this chapter when I first started getting
into it. I didn’t really like the fact that it was using young children’s work
as examples until about halfway through. I knew that it was all just to show
the development of writing and how we gradually learn to correct ourselves, but
it was irritating to have to think of my students as grade-school children.
Once I got past this annoyance I began really understanding
the purpose of the chapter. I enjoyed how the author talked about how the “errors”
people make are really just them still learning. After having only worked in
the classroom once so far, I noticed a lot of “common errors” in my students’
work. After reading this chapter, however, I see these errors as a way to help
my students improve their skills. I tend to forget that there needs to be certain
steps taken before any aspect is commonplace to a student and maybe my students
haven’t been taught those steps yet.
Seeing the development of the children used as examples in
this chapter also made me think about how much I can help my students develop in
the time that they are in my class. Even though they’ll start out at a higher
level than the young students in the book, the 14-18 year old students I have
will have a lot of opportunity for development in my class.
I really like the idea that the author gives of “reconceptualizing”
the writing process. By showing students that writing is an ongoing process we
will allow a more open ally to them as far as how they respond to the feedback
we provide. Along with this, the type of feedback we give is also addressed in
Weaver’s previous paragraphs. If we supply critique or feedback with a negative
tone, our students will not respond positively. We must frame the process and
feedback in a way that allows for improvement, not impediment.
No comments:
Post a Comment