This text covered a lot of interesting points. The portion
about student confusion really stuck out to me the most because it reminds me a
lot of the AVID process that I go through with my students at Rogers High
School every Tuesday. They bring in a Point Of Confusion (POC) and I make sure
the other students help the student get to the answer without just straight out
giving it to them. This relates to the text because the author talked about how
she would answer the students questions about reading and where they get stuck,
but she also would just give them flat out answers to problems they had with
the material. She helped them work through their issues by having them answer
the questions themselves.
Another aspect that I connected to was that of “fake
reading.” I know that I did A LOT of this in high school because I didn't like
reading. I would skim the pages or rely on my friends who used Sparknotes. As I've
grown older, however, I've learned the trouble of this. I still do it
sometimes, but it usually comes back to bite me in the ass. When it comes time
for discussions or tests, a lot of the material is generally specific and not
overarching. I also know that when I write material for my students when
covering a text, I tend to write questions that apply to a specific portion of
the text purposefully. I want to make sure they’re reading, and that shows who’s
been a fake reader.
Overall, there were many good points to consider in this text and I enjoyed it. I enjoyed the author's real-life input and the classroom examples she included to connect to the material.
No comments:
Post a Comment